Trusted byYC-backed founders and 5,000+ outbound teams
★★★★★
Replaced Apollo overnight. Reply rate went from 2% to 14% in week one. Wish I found this sooner.
Natasha B.Founder, B2B SaaS · Verified on Trustpilot★★★★★
I sent 300 emails on day one. By week 2 I had a closed deal. The verification alone is worth it.
Carlos V.Sales Lead, Series B · Verified on Trustpilot★★★★★
47 demos booked in 30 days. The unlimited sending is a game changer, I used to pay $300/mo for half this.
James O.Head of Growth, Agency · Verified on Trustpilot
Verdict
The quick verdict
ZoomInfo is the enterprise data platform; Lusha is the rep-level tool. ZoomInfo wins on depth (org charts, intent, integrations) at $15,000+ a year contracts; Lusha wins on accessibility with self-serve seats from $36 a month. The honest question is whether you are buying for a revenue org or for individual reps.
Feature by feature
ZoomInfo vs Lusha, side by side
Dimension
ZoomInfo
Lusha
Pricing
~$15,000+/yr contracts
$36-59/user/mo self-serve
Data depth
Org charts, intent, technographics
Contact-level reveals
Buying process
Sales cycle, procurement, annual
Credit card, today
Direct dials
Excellent coverage
Strong coverage
Integrations
Deep enterprise stack integrations
CRM basics
SMB fit
Overkill and overpriced
Designed for reps and small teams
Based on publicly listed plans and features, July 2026. Verify current details on each vendor's site.
Profiles
Each tool, in short
ZoomInfo
4.4/5 · $15,000+/yr
ZoomInfo is the enterprise standard: best-in-class firmographic data, intent signals and org charts. It is also priced like enterprise software, with contracts starting around $15,000 a year and procurement cycles to match.
Pros
Best-in-class data depth and intent
Org charts and direct dials
Enterprise-grade platform
Cons
$15K+/yr contracts
Sales calls and procurement to start
Overkill and overpriced for SMB
Lusha
4.3/5 · $36-59/user/mo
Lusha is the reveal button: a browser extension that surfaces emails and direct dials on LinkedIn profiles, backed by a searchable database. It is credit-metered per contact reveal, so active prospectors burn through allowances quickly and phone credits cost extra.
Pros
Excellent LinkedIn extension workflow
Strong direct-dial phone coverage
Fast one-click reveals
Cons
Credit-based reveals drain fast at volume
No sending or warm-up, data only
Bulk workflows gated to higher tiers
Decision guide
Which one should you pick?
Choose ZoomInfo if...
Enterprise revenue org with data budget and ops team
Intent data and org charts feed your plays
Procurement-grade compliance is a requirement
Choose Lusha if...
Individual reps or small teams prospecting on LinkedIn
You need dials without a five-figure contract
Self-serve monthly beats annual procurement
The third option
The third option: skip the subscription stack
Both tools above bill monthly, and neither covers the full workflow alone. Getlead bundles the lead database, SMTP verification, cold email sending and warm-up in one flat plan from $19.90 a month.
Tool
Best for
Price
Getlead
Founders, freelancers and agencies who want the entire lead gen and cold email stack for one flat monthly plan.
$19.90/mo
ZoomInfo
Enterprise sales orgs that monetize intent data, org charts and direct dials.
$15,000+/yr
Lusha
Sales reps who live in LinkedIn and want one-click contact reveals with phone numbers.
For rep-level contact reveals and dials, yes, at a fraction of the cost. For enterprise features (intent, org charts, deep integrations), no; those remain ZoomInfo's moat.
How much cheaper is Lusha?
Lusha starts around $432 a year per seat self-serve; ZoomInfo contracts realistically start around $15,000 a year. Different products for different buyers.
Do either send email?
Neither. Both are data-only; sending, warm-up and sequencing require separate tools.
What covers data plus sending for small teams?
Getlead: 177M+ verified contacts, SMTP verification and 300K monthly sends for a flat $19.90 a month.