Trusted byYC-backed founders and 5,000+ outbound teams
★★★★★
Replaced Apollo overnight. Reply rate went from 2% to 14% in week one. Wish I found this sooner.
Natasha B.Founder, B2B SaaS · Verified on Trustpilot★★★★★
I sent 300 emails on day one. By week 2 I had a closed deal. The verification alone is worth it.
Carlos V.Sales Lead, Series B · Verified on Trustpilot★★★★★
47 demos booked in 30 days. The unlimited sending is a game changer, I used to pay $300/mo for half this.
James O.Head of Growth, Agency · Verified on Trustpilot
Verdict
The quick verdict
Apollo is the fuller platform: database, sequences and a dialer in one subscription. Lusha is the better LinkedIn companion: one-click reveals with strong direct dials. Teams that prospect from a database pick Apollo; reps who prospect profile-by-profile on LinkedIn pick Lusha.
Feature by feature
Apollo.io vs Lusha, side by side
Dimension
Apollo.io
Lusha
Workflow
Database search + sequences + dialer
LinkedIn extension reveals
Pricing
$49-149/user/mo + export credits
$36-59/user/mo + reveal credits
Direct dials
Available, credit-expensive
Core strength
Bulk list building
Persona filters, bulk export
Profile-by-profile, slow at volume
Outreach tools
Sequences and dialer built in
None, data only
Ease of adoption
Fuller platform, more to learn
Install extension, start clicking
Based on publicly listed plans and features, July 2026. Verify current details on each vendor's site.
Profiles
Each tool, in short
Apollo.io
4.5/5 · $49-149/user/mo
Apollo is data-first: one of the largest native databases here, plus a dialer, sequencing and buying-intent signals on higher tiers. The catch is credit-based, per-seat pricing that makes an active seat cost far more than the sticker.
Pros
Large native B2B database
Dialer plus email in one platform
Buying-intent signals on higher tiers
Cons
Credit-based exports run out fast at volume
Per-seat pricing scales the bill
Deliverability is not its strength
Lusha
4.3/5 · $36-59/user/mo
Lusha is the reveal button: a browser extension that surfaces emails and direct dials on LinkedIn profiles, backed by a searchable database. It is credit-metered per contact reveal, so active prospectors burn through allowances quickly and phone credits cost extra.
Pros
Excellent LinkedIn extension workflow
Strong direct-dial phone coverage
Fast one-click reveals
Cons
Credit-based reveals drain fast at volume
No sending or warm-up, data only
Bulk workflows gated to higher tiers
Decision guide
Which one should you pick?
Choose Apollo.io if...
You build lists from ICP filters, not individual profiles
You want data and outreach in one subscription
Bulk volume matters more than per-contact depth
Choose Lusha if...
Your reps live inside LinkedIn all day
Direct-dial phone numbers drive your motion
You want the fastest possible single-contact lookup
The third option
The third option: skip the subscription stack
Both tools above bill monthly, and neither covers the full workflow alone. Getlead bundles the lead database, SMTP verification, cold email sending and warm-up in one flat plan from $19.90 a month.
Tool
Best for
Price
Getlead
Founders, freelancers and agencies who want the entire lead gen and cold email stack for one flat monthly plan.
$19.90/mo
Apollo.io
Sales teams that want a large native database, a dialer and intent data in one platform.
$49-149/user/mo
Lusha
Sales reps who live in LinkedIn and want one-click contact reveals with phone numbers.
Entry prices are similar ($36-59 vs $49-149 per user per month) and both meter usage with credits. Apollo includes sequences and a dialer; Lusha is data-only, so total stack cost usually favors Apollo.
Which has better phone numbers?
Lusha's direct-dial coverage is its differentiator. Apollo has phones too, but they consume credits fast.
Can either send cold email?
Apollo has native sequences. Lusha has no sending layer at all, so it always pairs with another tool.
What replaces both for email outreach?
Getlead: 177M+ persona-searchable contacts, SMTP verification and 300K monthly sends for a flat $19.90 a month, with no reveal or export credits.